<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Falling Dominos &#187; milwaukee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codepress.net/b/category/milwaukee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codepress.net/b</link>
	<description>Let&#039;s keep Lotus Notes development relevant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:36:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sharepoint Comparision 2</title>
		<link>http://codepress.net/b/2007/12/01/sharepoint-comparision-2/</link>
		<comments>http://codepress.net/b/2007/12/01/sharepoint-comparision-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom ONeil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[lotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepress.net/b/2007/12/01/sharepoint-comparision-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Trends &#8211; Round 2: Microsoft Exchange vs Lotus Notes vs SharePoint.
It&#8217;s interesting to see that Microsoft Exchange and Lotus Notes have lost &#8220;Google&#8221; interest. But wow&#8230; SharePoint is the new thing. I wish our group would look into SharePoint development (we currently do .NET and Lotus Notes). I&#8217;m selfishly thinking about what it would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Trends &#8211; Round 2: Microsoft Exchange vs Lotus Notes vs SharePoint.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to see that Microsoft Exchange and Lotus Notes have lost &#8220;Google&#8221; interest. But wow&#8230; SharePoint is the new thing. I wish our group would look into SharePoint development (we currently do .NET and Lotus Notes). I&#8217;m selfishly thinking about what it would look like on my resume.</p>
<p><a href="http://codepress.net/b/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/sharepoint2.png" title="Sharepoint Comparison 2"><img src="http://codepress.net/b/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/sharepoint2.thumbnail.png" alt="Sharepoint Comparison 2" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://codepress.net/b/2007/12/01/sharepoint-comparision-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brewers: New Reliever?</title>
		<link>http://codepress.net/b/2007/11/29/brewers-new-reliever/</link>
		<comments>http://codepress.net/b/2007/11/29/brewers-new-reliever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom ONeil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milwaukee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepress.net/b/2007/11/29/brewers-new-reliever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whew, the Brewers are close to deal with a solid veteran David Riske. I thought they were a bit too quick to sign a catcher after Estrada left but this gives me hope.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew, the Brewers are close to deal with a solid veteran <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3134072" target="_blank">David Riske</a>. I thought they were a bit too quick to sign a catcher after Estrada left but this gives me hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://codepress.net/b/2007/11/29/brewers-new-reliever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Copy Of</title>
		<link>http://codepress.net/b/2007/11/25/another-copy-of/</link>
		<comments>http://codepress.net/b/2007/11/25/another-copy-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 03:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom ONeil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milwaukee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codepress.net/b/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jaime has some fun at other Lotus Notes developers’ expense. In his latest rant, he explains why he titled his blog “Another Copy Of.”
I worked with Jaime at a few Notes shops and while I don’t think I’m the target of his article, I have been guilty of leaving a backup “Another Copy of Issue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaime has some fun at other Lotus Notes developers’ expense. In his latest <a target="_blank" href="http://jaimebisgrove.blogspot.com/2007/11/whats-in-name.html">rant</a>, he explains why he titled his blog “Another Copy Of.”</p>
<p>I worked with Jaime at a few Notes shops and while I don’t think I’m the target of his article, I have been guilty of leaving a backup “Another Copy of Issue Tracker” in the design for a few years.</p>
<p>Read his other rants <a target="_blank" href="http://jaimebisgrove.blogspot.com/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://codepress.net/b/2007/11/25/another-copy-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
